[PD-dev] Re: [PD] Re: [PD-announce] sIgpAck-0.03b
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sun Jan 22 17:33:27 CET 2006
On Jan 22, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2006, at 5:30 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> primary contributor and cheerleader. Plus its the only current
>>> distro that I know of (some others were based off of the same build
>>> system, like pd++. The pd++ changes were then incorporated into
>>> Pd-extended).
>>
>> well, the only _current_ pd-distro that i know of, is debian (holding
>> pd-0.39 plus a bunch of externals)
>>
>> which shouldn't make your (and other's) efforts less...
>
> I didn't realize that the Debian packages were being updated (Not that
> I am faulting Guenter at all, Pd-extended was built upon his work).
> The newest "pd-externals" and "pd-zexy" packages that I see are both
> from 2004-06-25. The "puredata" package is more up-to-date than
> Pd-extended. "gem" seems up to date, and PDP hasn't changed in a long
> while, so "pd-pdp" is up to date. pidip is missing from Debian tho.
>
> If you go outside of Debian repositories, you can get some up-to-date
> stuff here: http://sindominio.net/~caedes/debian/readme
Oops, I almost forgot flext & externals. The only Debian packages I
see for flext are "pd-flext" and "pd-flext-dev", none for externals.
The two existing one are in experimental and haven't been updated in a
while.
My point in all this is that hopefully we can get the Debian packages
generated from Pd-extended also, so that we can join forces on all this
building grunt work. I believe Frank has started. I am hoping that
pure::dyne will merge with Pd-extended build system as well, the more
the merrier! Share the grunt work!
.hc
________________________________________________________________________
____
http://at.or.at/hans/
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list