[PD-dev] list math
matju at artengine.ca
Tue Feb 14 13:49:46 CET 2006
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> [mapping/clip] object would just be a shortcut, which could also create
> confusion. If someone imports "math/list" before "mapping", then [clip]
> would loose its defaults. So I think that it would probably be a better
> idea to just use [math/list/clip] in the context of mapping.
Anyone cares about higher-order functions? use a class name as the $1.
I don't want to have 666 more classes just because someone thinks that
higher-order functions can be avoided.
I don't think there ought to be more than one [map] class.
And btw, no-one calls that a "mapping" in the real world.
What about generic [zip] [fold] [scan] now?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-dev