[PD-dev] Re: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 30
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Thu Nov 30 03:10:24 CET 2006
On Nov 29, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
> Hallo!
>
>> We already have two devel_0_39, separated not by cvs but by #ifdef
>> and makefiles. Now it's getting somewhat cumbersome for me, but it
>> seems that in addition to that, it's getting somewhat cumbersome
>> for the only person (?) who still works on devel_0_39 outside of
>> DesireData. Well, what do you want us to do, I don't think that
>> you really want us to stay in that uncomfortable position forever? :)
>
> No, but you said it yourself: you joined (after impure data) the
> pd_devel branch so that you can also benefit from those
> improvements ...
>
> Now there is already the main and devel/desire_data branch and I
> think such a marginal problem as you have (the beautification ...)
> should not be the reason for one more branch ...
A CVS branch is just a tool to manage code. I don't think we need to
take it as any kind of social or political statement. We should use
the tools to reduce friction as much as possible.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mistrust authority - promote decentralization. - the hacker ethic
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list