[PD-dev] new distro: pd-vanilla+libs
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Fri Apr 18 18:16:22 CEST 2008
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo Hans,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Now that Pd can be built on all platforms without patches, I think we
>> can have a "pd-vanilla+libs" distro that is based on an unpatched pd-
>> vanilla build. It could also have a more limited subset of included
>> libraries, much like others have been proposing. They would be
>> having the same library format and install methods as Pd-extended, so
>> that patches would be compatible.
>
> I think, this is a very good idea and I'll stick it on my TODO list,
> however I believe, that instead of a vanilla+libs bundle a pure "libs"
> installer/package would be more appropriate, kind of like the
> traditional pd-externals package. We already have binary packages of
> vanilla Pd (Miller's and autobuild) and I believe it's easier to get
> more people to use the same externals setup by providing a package
> independent from a certain Pd build.
Ultimately, that sounds like a good goal, but it would also be a lot
more work, and would cuase more bugs. There are incompatibilities
between versions, not always large, but there. That means you'd then
have to add code to manage that. Externals are a lot like linux
kernel modules. Sure, it is possible to create module binaries that
work with different versions of the kernel, but the vast majority of
people choose to ship source, and only include binaries that are tied
to a specific kernel version.
So it seems to me the thing to do is first get the one big build
working, then the people can split up the packages if they want.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list