[PD-dev] stripping down Pd-extended's default libs

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Tue Feb 17 20:13:53 CET 2009

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 11:24 +0100, marius schebella wrote:
> hey hans,
> if it's called "extended" and you strip it down to the bare bones,
> then where's the extended part?

i think, noone wanted to strip down anything. this is only about not
loading the whole bunch of libs automatically anymore. how does that
make pd-extended less 'extended'?

> eventually, I think users should not have to bother with namespaces at
> all. I still consider namespace declarations in a visual dataflow
> programming tool to be a hack.

can you elaborate that a bit?  to me it looks perfectly normal, that i
have to at least call the tools, that i am going to use. 


Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list