[PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Feb 19 09:56:05 CET 2009

Roman Haefeli wrote:
> sorry for causing confusion. when i speak about differences in
> pd-extended and pd vanilla i usually refer to the way of how libraries
> in pd-extended are built and not to any difference in the core of
> pd-extended and pd vanilla (which might doesn't exist anyway). so when i
> mentioned an 'incompatibility between pd-extended and pd vanilla', i
> actually meant to say 'an incompatibility caused by different ways of
> how libraries are built'. i'll try to make that more clear in the
> future.

but haven't i just illustrated that the way libraries are built in 
Pd-extended are no foolproof way to not override internals?
so there is no "incompatibility caused by different ways of
how libraries are built'.
(it is a bit harder to trigger the problem on pdx though)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20090219/6db25614/attachment.bin>

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list