[PD-dev] namespaces for send/receive

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> If you use the route-approach, you can use settable routes (as an abstraction 
> like sroute.pd in [list]-abs). But actually I have no idea why a settable 
> receive should be necessary anyway? :)

One example is the GFDP (GridFlow Documentation Project), which uses settable 
receives because it uses receive-symbols that are local to the toplevel patch 
they are in (an intermediate between global and the ordinary local). This value 
has to be output by an object, so it cannot appear directly in an [r] box, and 
the GFDP doesn't use that much dynamic patching...

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801