[PD-dev] removing non-free code from pure-data SVN

[Jonathan Wilkes]

What happens if it stays where it 
is?  Does Sourceforge complain?  Debian?  Will it be detrimental 
to people's projects that use Pd?  Will it impede Pd's development?

-Jonathan

--- On Wed, 12/8/10, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:

> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
> Subject: [PD-dev] removing non-free code from pure-data SVN
> To: "pd-dev List" <pd-dev at iem.at>
> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 9:10 PM
> 
> So we now have two non-free libraries included in the
> pure-data SVN: pidip and unauthorized.  As far as I
> understand it, this is in violation of what SourceForge asks
> of projects, and also seems to me in violation of the
> developers on the pure-data SourceForge, since the rest of
> the code there uses free licenses (mostly GPL, BSD-like, and
> Tcl-like).
> 
> So the question is: should we remove pidip and unauthorized
> from the pure-data SVN?
> 
> .hc
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else
> is publicity.          - Bill
> Moyers
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>