[PD-dev] removing non-free code from pure-data SVN

[Sergi Lario]

we hurry?

I think remove is not a solution although, if I'm not wrong,  it seems will
happen in the near future like all the others external libraries.

The fact that it is a useful tool and consolidated should be enough to
respect the work done (pd-extended integration too) and its authors.

Everyone is free to be in accordance with the license, and then use it or
not, keep or remove.

As has been said many times an informative text in its installation should
be sufficient.

Witches were burned centuries ago, now we don't need.

Sergi.

[Santa]
|          \
[Laws] [Likifreaks]



On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> On 2010-12-08 21:37, Xavier Miller wrote:
> > Hello,
> >.
> >
> > So, yes, please list ALL the licences which are included in
> > PD/PD-extended, especially those that are not compatible with common
> > Open Source / Free licences !
> > At least users need to know they use non-free parts of software, and use
> > it being aware of it.
>
> i head the impression, that we are not talking what is included in
> pd-extended here.
> instead we are talking about the source code hosted in the public
> "pure-data" repository at sourceforge.
> while Pd-extended includes most stuff from this repository and hardly
> anything else, the two are independent.
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20101209/c4819040/attachment.htm>