[PD-dev] pd-double build still having single externals

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Mon Oct 10 18:35:57 CEST 2011


Indeed, its true.  That's a tricky problem.  I think I got it right  
this time, I just pushed my commit to github.  Basically, I made it so  
PD_FLOAT_PRECISION is set in m_pd.h based on the bitness of the build,  
but can be overridden by externally setting PD_FLOAT_PRECISION.  So  
the ./configure flags just serve to force either 64-bit double or 32- 
bit float, but by default it'll use double on __LP64__ or _WIN64, and  
float on anything else.

Having this in the m_pd.h header will mean that it'll automatically  
apply to the externals too, unless overridden.

.hc

On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:33 AM, katja wrote:

> Hans, there's so many externals in pd-double giving weird output, I
> couldn't believe it's all wrong in the code. So I searched for a class
> which is definitely double-ready and which can act as a test class for
> the build of the lib where it is part of. For cyclone [mean] can do
> this, see attached patch. It's code is double-ready and does not
> depend on anything else than m_pd.h. Still it's output makes no sense
> in pd-double.
>
> Apparently, the build rules for the external classes do not include
> the PD_FLOAT_PRECISION definition..
>
> For this reason, it is at the moment not opportune to announce
> pd-double ready for testing. If people would really start testing now,
> a tsunami of bug reports could follow, many of which boil down to this
> single wrong macro definition. We better avoid such needless
> administrative hassle.
>
> Katja
>
>
>
> p.s.
>
> I was talking about the Pd-0.43.1-double-20111009-macosx106-x86_64.dmg
> build, which has double precision core.
> The build in Pd-0.43.1-double-20111010-macosx106-x86_64.dmg crashes at
> startup on OSX 10.5:
>
> Exception Type:  EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
> Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
> Crashed Thread:  0
>
> Dyld Error Message:
>  unknown required load command 0x80000022
> <mean-test.pd.zip>_______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.





More information about the Pd-dev mailing list