[PD-dev] vanilla and extended on OSX

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

If you build against Pd-extended, there might be some incompatibilities with
vanilla.  But if you build against vanilla, it should work fine in both.

.hc

On 05/17/2013 05:04 AM, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
> Hi devs,
> 
>  I run into a very strange problem with a binary external compiled for
> osx. It seems the binary works fine on pd-extended 0.44-3 but not on
> vanilla 0.44-3 (that has been tested on OSX 10.7 and up on different
> machines). The external's same binary has been running without any
> problems on extended and vanbilla since OSX 10.4. The external uses
> statically linked gnu-libraries and considering the errors in the pd
> window it seems the problem has something to do with them.
> 
> Does anybody know the differences between vanilla and extended on OSX?
> I realized that extended seems to use X11 while vanilla doesn't need
> it, then I read something about full utf-8 support (this could have
> some effect as the external dynamically creates and reads in patches)
> and maybe there are different compiler settings. Maybe that gets me
> somewhere...
> 
> --
> Orm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>