[PD-dev] optionally building po/

[Dan Wilcox]

The patch works except for 1 issue: the “” empty string actually shows up in the list, so make dies with a no “” target found error.

Fix is just to leave the variable empty ala

empty=

In any case, I confirm it works now as I could build *with* and *without* gettext installed.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That’s helpful, thanks. I’ll throw up what I’m doing soon and include this.
> 
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:11 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>> 
>> From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>>
>> Subject: [PD-dev] optionally building po/
>> Date: April 26, 2016 at 4:00:00 PM MDT
>> To: PureData developer's list <pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at lists.iem.at>>
>> 
>> 
>> i remember somebody mentioning problems with the autotools-based build
>> failing if gettext was not installed.
>> alas, i cannot find the email (but i suspect dan).
>> 
>> anyhow, could that person (or somebody else) test whether the attached
>> patch fixes this? (it should just not try to build the po files)
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20160426/3cef644d/attachment-0001.html>