[PD-dev] optionally building po/
msp at ucsd.edu
Sat Apr 30 01:49:31 CEST 2016
Since I don't know what's going on... do you mean to put the line
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:30:45PM -0600, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> The patch works except for 1 issue: the “” empty string actually shows up in the list, so make dies with a no “” target found error.
> Fix is just to leave the variable empty ala
> In any case, I confirm it works now as I could build *with* and *without* gettext installed.
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> > On Apr 26, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com> wrote:
> > That’s helpful, thanks. I’ll throw up what I’m doing soon and include this.
> > --------
> > Dan Wilcox
> > @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> >> On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:11 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at> wrote:
> >> From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at <mailto:zmoelnig at iem.at>>
> >> Subject: [PD-dev] optionally building po/
> >> Date: April 26, 2016 at 4:00:00 PM MDT
> >> To: PureData developer's list <pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-dev at lists.iem.at>>
> >> i remember somebody mentioning problems with the autotools-based build
> >> failing if gettext was not installed.
> >> alas, i cannot find the email (but i suspect dan).
> >> anyhow, could that person (or somebody else) test whether the attached
> >> patch fixes this? (it should just not try to build the po files)
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
More information about the Pd-dev