[PD-dev] 0.48-1 release plans

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

2017-12-02 19:18 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>:

> I believe it's up on github.  I think you 'pull' it and then
> 'git checkout 0.48-1'.
>

Ahá! Found it

https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/tree/0.48-1



>
> cheers
> Miller
>
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:52:52PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > hi, where can we check your new 0.48-1 branch?
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > 2017-12-02 17:40 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>:
> >
> > > OK, I ended up pushing to a new branch (just to stay on the safe side
> for
> > > now).
> > > Assuming all looks OK I can make this the main branch.
> > >
> > > I had one small ouch: I don't think I can compatibly change t_int to
> int
> > > in m_pd.h (this is mentioned on another thread somewhere).  I don't
> know
> > > how
> > > to make clang pipe down about this short of casting almost every call
> to
> > > atom_getint*() in the whole tree.  Yuck...  Maybe it's better just to
> tell
> > > clang to be more permissive (if that's possible)?
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, I think PRs are starting to appear on top of the existing
> PRs...
> > > and/or they're growing since I tried to merge them.  I don't know how
> to
> > > get github to think of the PRs as against the 0.48-1 branch, so my
> thought
> > > for the moment is to wait until it looks save to merge 0.48-1 into
> master
> > > and
> > > then try merging whatever PRs might have changed.
> > >
> > > In case some PR in fact hasn't been added to since I made all the
> merges, I
> > > think it will look like it has been merged once I merge the 0.48-1
> branch
> > > into master.  So at that point it should be easier to figure out which
> PRs
> > > need to be re-merged.
> > >
> > > cheers
> > > Miller
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> > > > Sounds good. Let me know if I can help, ie. merge some of the various
> > > PRs into a single PR.
> > > >
> > > > > On Nov 30, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I put this right in 'head' on a clone of my own repo; it compiles
> OK
> > > for me
> > > > > here on linux/64 and widows-32 so I think it's provisionally
> working,
> > > but needs
> > > > > lots of testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > If there's no reason not to I'll just throw that all in my own
> 'head'
> > > and push
> > > > > it all back to the git repo.
> > > >
> > > > --------
> > > > Dan Wilcox
> > > > @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> > > > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
> > > > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pd-dev mailing list
> > > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pd-dev mailing list
> > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-dev mailing list
> > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20171202/594de7e1/attachment.html>