[PD-dev] roadmap for Pd-0.49?
Miller Puckette
msp at ucsd.edu
Sun Sep 2 23:00:23 CEST 2018
I hope to get the intelligent patching features in - but not sure about the
pointer-invalid problem; I've been thinking for years about how to do that
and haven't liked any of the solutions I've seen yet.
cheers
Miller
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 02:52:37AM +0000, Henri Augusto Bisognini wrote:
> Hi! Since we got on the subject of 0.49 do you guys mind if i ask a couple questions about what's planned? Just out of curiosity and excitement : )
>
> -I see there's a PR (#383) that adds a delete method for [pointer]. There's any forecast for that feature? I've been waiting that one heh
>
> -Also will 0.49 come with the intelligent patching features IOhannes been working on? That will be a dream come true.
>
> Cheers
> Henri.
>
>
> ________________________________
> De: Pd-dev <pd-dev-bounces at lists.iem.at> em nome de Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>
> Enviado: s?bado, 1 de setembro de 2018 21:28
> Para: Christof Ressi
> Cc: pd-dev
> Assunto: Re: [PD-dev] roadmap for Pd-0.49?
>
> Looking back I've only been able to get out a bit fewer than one major
> release per year... I hope to speed this up now that there are much better
> scripts and tools in place (thanks mostly to other people!)
>
> My own situation is that I go into heavy teaching mode again Sept. 24 so
> I'll either succeed and get out 0.49 before then or fail and only get it out
> late December. If I do get 0.49 working quickly I'll then aim for 0.50 in
> February or March.
>
> For 0.49 I want to fix the escaping of '\' characters (I had earlier tried
> to make it possible simply never to make a `\` character visible to the
> user but this has turned out to be impossible). Also I want to fix pasting
> to place objects under the mouse (or at the very least, somewhere visible,
> not off the edge of the window)
>
> For the medium term I'm thinking about revisiting array drawing to make it
> more efficient and controllable, and expanding the capabilities of the 'atom'
> box (lists; texts).
>
> Also I have a vague plan to make an API feature to guide DSP graph sorting
> order, e.g., to request that one item in a patch be sorted in advance of
> another without them being connected by a patch cord.
>
> Anyway, I think whatever happens to 0.49 I can deal with feature PRs anytime
> this fall and get them into a release by late winter.
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 12:32:47AM +0200, Christof Ressi wrote:
> > Hi Miller,
> >
> > I just wanted to ask what's your approximate roadmap for Pd 0.49? Do I need to hurry up if I want to propose stuff or is there plenty of time left? :-)
> >
> > Christof
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list