[PD-dev] roadmap for Pd-0.49?

[Miller Puckette]

damn, I thought I already did that.  Done now...

thanks
M
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:53:14PM +0200, Christof Ressi wrote:
> I'm really excited about this release! thanks a lot for all your work!
> 
> I've got one last tiny wish for 0.49: can we finally get rid of the 4000000 limit in soundfiler? :-) I suggested to use LONG_MAX: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/366, but 0x7fffffff should be fine as well (on Windows it's the same anyway...)
> 
> Christof
> 
> > Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2018 um 21:19 Uhr
> > Von: "Miller Puckette" <msp at ucsd.edu>
> > An: pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > Betreff: Re: [PD-dev] roadmap for Pd-0.49?
> >
> > To Pd dev -
> > 
> > I've finally got a version of Tck/Tk 8.5 patched for macintosh to work around
> > the key-up bug (by back-porting the bugfix from 8.6 and then making a
> > further mod - the fix is on msp.ucsd.edu/tmp/misc/tk8.5.19-pd49-src.tar.gz
> > if anyone else wants to try it.
> > 
> > Meanwhile I'm hoping to get 0.49 test1 out today - to do this I'll grab
> > whatever small and uncontroversial PRs I can fold in without too much
> > conflick-resolving and go on and compile everything.
> > 
> > Some larger issues are still hanging, for instance, the dollar-zero idea -
> > I don't think I can get these resolved quickly.  Also, I have some
> > difficulties dealing with PRs in general that I'd like to open a discussion
> > about in another thread.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, going forward, if I've mis-applied PRs (which I bet I have), I'm
> > happy to try to resolve them during the test period, and I'm happy to try to
> > fix remaining reported bugs (when the fix doesn't seem to risk introducing new
> > problems) and merge bug-fixing PRs.
> > 
> > cheers - and thanks to everyone who has contributed!
> > Miller
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-dev mailing list
> > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> >