[PD-dev] call for discussion double-precision file extension

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 3/30/22 16:16, Christof Ressi wrote:
>>
>> i do not want to have zexy.darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32.so 
> maybe a bundle structure (as described in 
> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2022-03/022997.html) might 
> not be such a bad idea after all?

maybe.
it solves problems like auxiliary libraries and keeps the directory 
reasonably clean.

but i don't really see how it would help with fat binaries.

dgfmsfa
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20220330/7267e8bd/attachment.sig>