[PD-dev] multichannel signals, preliminary support

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

Em ter., 17 de jan. de 2023 às 13:21, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu>
escreveu:

> This is possible using "-do" (distribute outputs) in which case inlet~s
> are passed in unchanged.
>

I see it now, I couldn't get it to work but I was trying a multichannel
input into it with [pack~]. I was trying a simple patch insted of
'straightthrough' and I just added a [+~ $1], so I'd add a value to each
channel according to the instance number. I did expect it to ignore other
channels but it didn't work and it complained that [+~] couldn't handle
multichannel. But a single input signal does really work and this is quite
cool and amazing :) really happy I can already mess with this.


> Incidentally, now I think the word "distribute" is ambiguous - does anyone
> have a better word for packing/unpacking on way in and out of clones?
>

fan-in/fan-out? ('fi', 'fo')

cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230117/541549f3/attachment-0001.htm>