[PD-dev] pack~/unpack~ (was Re: multichannel signals, preliminary support)

[Max]

Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
when "joining" two signals, I wouldn't expect them to be running in 
parallel but being mixed together.

m.


On 24.01.23 02:50, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
> So merging (hmm) some ideas from Fede and Dan, maybe "join~/split~", and
> a new tap~ object that allows you to pick channels out specifically.  Then
> I think for example "clone osc~" might do OK for making an oscillator bank -
> assuming it turns out to be practical to send message-time lists to the
> frequency input.  (Maybe that's someting clone should know how to do in other
> situations too).
> 
> still thinking about, for instance, "clone -" to make clones of an anonymous
> abstraction that you just edit into being live...
> 
> cheers
> Miller