[PD-dev] pack~/unpack~ (was Re: multichannel signals, preliminary support)

[Miller Puckette]

OK... now I'm hesitating between "snake~ in", "snake~ out" and "snake~ tap"
or "join~", "split~", and "tap~"...

Former is more colorful (and crowds the namespace less).  Latter might be
easier for non-native English speakers to deal with?

cheers
Miller

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:36:24AM +0100, Christof Ressi wrote:
> > Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
> Unfortunately, these are also zexy objects ;-)
> 
> On 24.01.2023 11:52, Max wrote:
> > Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
> > when "joining" two signals, I wouldn't expect them to be running in
> > parallel but being mixed together.
> > 
> > m.
> > 
> > 
> > On 24.01.23 02:50, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
> > > So merging (hmm) some ideas from Fede and Dan, maybe "join~/split~", and
> > > a new tap~ object that allows you to pick channels out
> > > specifically.  Then
> > > I think for example "clone osc~" might do OK for making an
> > > oscillator bank -
> > > assuming it turns out to be practical to send message-time lists to the
> > > frequency input.  (Maybe that's someting clone should know how to do
> > > in other
> > > situations too).
> > > 
> > > still thinking about, for instance, "clone -" to make clones of an
> > > anonymous
> > > abstraction that you just edit into being live...
> > > 
> > > cheers
> > > Miller
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-dev mailing list
> > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!Mih3wA!HryblqiKFNOUuYK6t8PJBkK26yPJYdgDiMv_z36_t9-4PQk9SJpBcxy7Jd13FSr1fRDVtVGBQd6WsA$
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!Mih3wA!HryblqiKFNOUuYK6t8PJBkK26yPJYdgDiMv_z36_t9-4PQk9SJpBcxy7Jd13FSr1fRDVtVGBQd6WsA$