question: should toys be part of Pd distribution?

Mark Danks mdanks at
Wed Feb 2 17:29:49 CET 2000

  With the larger distributions (like GEM), it makes sense to keep them
seperate.  In general, I think that the less downloading of packages that
people need to do, the better.

  Also, what are the chances that Guenter's slider, bang, and toggle objects
could be integrated?

Later, Mark

= mdanks at

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miller Puckette [mailto:mpuckett at man104-1.UCSD.Edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 9:21 PM
> To: pd-list at
> Subject: question: should toys be part of Pd distribution?
> Hi Pd-ers,
> would it be more convenient for you if I integrated "toys" (the pitch
> tracker, expr, and other really useful things) as part of the Pd
> distribution?  It would make the distribution grow by 150K or so...
> I'm raising the question because I'm writing a phase object 
> for sampling
> (which someone suggested here a year or so ago) and want to 
> put something
> in "soundfile-tools" in the pd distribution which uses the 
> new object...
> it seems as if that would be a good reason to put "toys" in 
> the distribution
> of Pd...
> cheers
> Miller

More information about the Pd-list mailing list