question: should toys be part of Pd distribution?
mdanks at Stormfront.com
Wed Feb 2 17:29:49 CET 2000
With the larger distributions (like GEM), it makes sense to keep them
seperate. In general, I think that the less downloading of packages that
people need to do, the better.
Also, what are the chances that Guenter's slider, bang, and toggle objects
could be integrated?
= mdanks at stormfront.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miller Puckette [mailto:mpuckett at man104-1.UCSD.Edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 9:21 PM
> To: pd-list at iem.mhsg.ac.at
> Subject: question: should toys be part of Pd distribution?
> Hi Pd-ers,
> would it be more convenient for you if I integrated "toys" (the pitch
> tracker, expr, and other really useful things) as part of the Pd
> distribution? It would make the distribution grow by 150K or so...
> I'm raising the question because I'm writing a phase object
> for sampling
> (which someone suggested here a year or so ago) and want to
> put something
> in "soundfile-tools" in the pd distribution which uses the
> new object...
> it seems as if that would be a good reason to put "toys" in
> the distribution
> of Pd...
More information about the Pd-list