[PD] pix_buf and separator

IOhannes zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.kug.ac.at
Mon Mar 10 09:00:51 CET 2003


bbogart at ryerson.ca wrote:
> I've had no problems with separator and pix_video under linux or OSX. 
i have changed both the [pix_buf] and [separator] (adding a memory leak 
to this...) in the CVSto fix the crash.
It might be, that you are using the latest CVS-version, while 01ek is not.

> 
> Seperator should be the right object, if you just put the texturing stuff before the separator and translation and rotation after the separator then only the texture should be shared between the objects... 



>>that the separator object would work to do this. But the separtaor 
>>alwayscrashes PD when I have an active pix_video in the chain. So 
>>Rainer told me
>>to us the pix_buf instead, but that doesn't work either. I'm on 
so [pix_buf] is really only for buffering image-data (and has nothing to 
do with rotation, translation, or whatever)

>>Windows 2000
>>with Gem 0.87; are the bugs you mention fixing responsible?
i think so.

>>
>>I can't get a clear answer of whether the separator is supposed to 
>>work.Does it work with the pix_film, _movie, _video objects on 
>>other platforms?
it should ;-) (and does on my machine)


mfg.as.dr
IOhannes





More information about the Pd-list mailing list