Wiki glossary - was: [PD] programatically (dynamically) load abstractions?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Hallo,
> Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
> 
> > I visited this site 
> > (http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?PdInternalMessages , which is great) 
> > and then, out of a misunderstanding (as i think), started to document 
> > the WikiWords appearing there, like symbol, gimme, float etc. It seems 
> > to be the case that pure text has been imported which contained some 
> > [...] words, resulting in a WikiWord interpretation.
> 
> No, I think this is a great idea in general. But of course, not every
> "gimme" should be interpreted as a Pd gimme, e.g. "gimme some time to fix
> that", but actually it is not. See for example: 
> http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?SandBox
> 
> So the gimmes on the InternalMessage page are actually marked up as
> things that might need documentation by the farsighted original author. 
> 
> I only wonder, if the Pd-Wiki should not move over to pure-data.org
> somehow.

This should definitely be moved to pure-data.org.  But instead of building
new wiki-based sites, I think new stuff should be done in the Plone-style
of making pages and publishing them.  Its much more managable.

.hc
 

	zen
	   \
	    \
	     \