[PD] DSP loop detection and abstractions/subpatches

[derek holzer]

 > ...Pd throws up an error about a DSP loop.  In fact there is no real
 > loop because it works fine with the abstraction replaced by the objects
 > it contains.

 > BTW, I tested also with a [pd ...] subpatch and that threw up the same
 > DSP loop error.


Last April I took it onto myself to find a DSP Loop solution. My answer 
is here:

http://iem.at/mailinglists/pd-list/2004-04/019516.html

The key was to use [send~] and [receive~] pairs, and somehow this keeps 
PD from discovering any DSP loops. Let me know if that helps!

d.




-- 
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 170:
"Use something nearby as a model"