[PD] ASIO latency (windows)
gr at grrrr.org
Mon Nov 22 23:34:30 CET 2004
It would be great if you could simply try out the native ASIO implementation
of devel_0_38 and give some feedback.
I'm having fun with my RME HDSP, running at measured latencies below 10 ms.
With Portaudio i never achieved latencies below 25 ms.
It works mostly, although with some things still to fix. Tim and i are
positive that the latency can still be reduced.
> I had problems too, trying to start pd 0.38test10 with an emagic emi 2/6.
> (Won't run at all).
> Seems that the portaudio code of pd is less than optimal. Not sure if
> the way to solve this is writing native ASIO code, as it is done currently
> by Tim and Tom (;)), or to fix the portaudio stuff.
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, smoerk wrote:
> > hello,
> > is it possible to get low latency with Pd and asio drivers on windows? i
> > have a usb audio card (hercules dj console, don't lough), that works
> > very well with audiomulch (4ms latency), but with Pd i have dropouts
> > with the default 70ms delay.
> > as the usb card works perfectly with audiomulch, why doesn't it work
> > with pd? both use portaudio? are there any command line parameter i have
> > to apply?
> > (btw, how do i get a list of alle the command line parameters with pd
> > 0.38-test10?)
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
More information about the Pd-list