[PD] tabread4~ vs. vd~ (was: Wave Shaping)

david golightly davigoli at hotmail.com
Sat Feb 5 17:45:33 CET 2005


related question:  which would be faster:  writing an incoming signal to an 
array in real time (tabwrite~) or using a delay line (delwrite~) of the same 
length (ca. 4000 ms)?  (i'm trying to implement a delay-line granulator that 
can pitch-shift in realtime using grains w/dur <= 200 ms, & trying to do it 
the least expensive way possible...)

thanks,
david

>From: zmoelnig at iem.at
>To: Phillip Stearns <mindphone_divided at yahoo.com>
>CC: pd-list at iem.at
>Subject: Re: [PD] Wave Shaping
>Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:00:03 +0100 (CET)
>
>Zitiere Phillip Stearns <mindphone_divided at yahoo.com>:
>
> > Thanks for the tip!  So is general rule to avoid realtime expr~ objects
> > if at all possible in the future?
> >
>
>i would have thought though some months ago, but matiu and tim taught me 
>better.
>
>[expr~] is a very useful and fast object (it is not slower than writing the
>maths in pd) (to know this would have saved me a _lot_ of patching in the 
>past)
>
>mfg.asd.r
>IOhannes
>
>_______________________________________________
>PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list






More information about the Pd-list mailing list