R: [PD] resonant comb filter series

derek holzer derek at x-i.net
Wed Feb 16 18:31:55 CET 2005

If you really wanna see the math, or at least two different versions 
that involve using sampling rate, see here:


and here:



pix wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:35:09PM +0100, Davide Morelli wrote:

>>why must we do
>>deltime (msec) = (samplerate~ / Freq(Hz)) / 1000 instead?
> you shouldn't have to do this, you would only need to involve
> samplerate~ if you were calculating the number of samples in the delay
> line. but you don't need to, you just give it milliseconds and vd~ sorts
> out the annoying stuff internally.
> the 1000/freq function you found should work as it gives you the
> wavelength (in msecs) of the given frequency.

derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 36:
"Consult other sources

More information about the Pd-list mailing list