[PD] zexy 2.0 without [nop]

[derek holzer]

Hi Roman, IOhannes,

 > me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.

More than "cosmetical", [nop~] is employed in the use of [limiter~] as a 
way of delaying the signal one sample block. This makes the new Zexy 
reverse-incompatible with its own help files for another object, as well 
as any patches out there using [limiter~] as the help files would 
suggest you to.

d.


Roman Haefeli wrote:
> hi
> 
> me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.
> now i found out that it has been dropped from zexy.  is there a reason
> to drop an object when it's already introduced? i mean, it's _not_ that
> difficult to change the patches, so it's not a big deal, but i think
> [nop] didn't "disturb" the library, or did it?



-- 
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 186:
"Work at a different speed"