[PD] OSX x86 pd/gem is workin'!

[Pat Pagano]

thanks jamie, you have made me feel so much better




On Jun 8, 2005, at 12:19 PM, james tittle wrote:

> On Jun 8, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
>>
>> The "cos~" problem I should have anticipated... if we're in MacOSX,
>> the code assumes big-endian... I think.  Proably the __FreeBSD_ test
>> could also include MAXOSX, assuming it defines the constants
>> BYTE_ORDER and LITTLE_ENDIAN in a unix-ish way...
>
> ...yep, I checked for the __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and it is defined, so we 
> should got with that kind of check...of course it also has the 
> expected __SSE__, __SSE2__, i386, __i386, blahblahblah...I still feel 
> strange seeing that on a mac :-)  But it's certainly another testament 
> to the portability of pd!
>
> jamie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
Patrick Pagano, B.S., M.F.A
Digital Media Specialist
University of Floirda
Digital Worlds Institute
352-294-2082