[PD] RFC: "list split" abstraction for negative indices

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> 
> 
>>(Note: I tend to prefer sendign "3 4"  to the first outlet, as it's
>>technically easier, but I would like your opinions, too.)
> 
> 
> Note 2: Logically I tend to prefer it the other way around, as it
> makes it easier for example to allow negative rotations of lists.
> 

that is why [niagara] works like this.

i (being zexy) would prefer the [niagara] way of splitting lists at 
negative indices.
btw, i just wanted to start to implement niagara as an abstraction based 
on [list].
i will not do it now...(but rather wait)

mfg.asdr.
IOhannes