[PD] multiio vs. arduino?
Davide Morelli
info at davidemorelli.it
Wed Apr 19 18:11:39 CEST 2006
Hi,
I have both of them, but I haven't effectively used arduino yet..
> - ease of use (what's necessary to install, etc)
multio can be used on linux with [hid] but I prefer using the external I
wrote with mamalala: [multio], it runs on both linux and mac and windows, it
requires libusb to be compiled (and libusb-win32)
arduino needs to be "programmed" using a proprietary software (java-based)
that runs on mac and windows (and with some work should work on linux too).
you have to know how to write java code to use arduino.
> - number / compatibility of sensors
the multio highly outnumbers arduino in this
(arduino has 6 analog ins, multio has up to 88)
> - function in both windows and unix
see above
> - price
arduino is cheaper than multio
> - behaviour on pratical situations (performances, concerts,
> installations...)
>
> - and any other that you can think of.
>
arduino is nice because:
* it is cheap
* it is small
* once programmed it can work without a computer attached (for simple tasks)
multio is nice because:
* it is powerful
* doesn't need to be programmed
* it is extensible
ciao,
davide.
> Thanks again,
>
> joao
>
> --
> Lugostr. 14
> 79100 Freiburg i. Br.
> Deutschland
> +49 (0)761 7074997
> jmmmpais at googlemail.com
> http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list