[PD] ead~?

Frank Barknecht fbar at footils.org
Thu Jun 22 00:07:10 CEST 2006


Hallo,
padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:

> At the risk of being controvertial, there really are certain units
> that one would consider ** absolutely essential ** that haven't
> found their way into the intrinsic core of Pd, from the top of my
> head things like [adsr~], [ead~] [inv] (simple reciprocal) come to
> mind. 

An ADSR is included in Pd as an abstraction, once in the audio
examples, once as "gadsr" in doc/7.stuff/synth

[inv] is simply: 
  
  [f ]
  |
  [1 $1(
  |
  [/ ]

or [expr 1/$f1], one could make it an abstraction as well. 

Cloning [ead~] is a bit more tricky, but not too much. Btw: Cloning
ead~ and using [vline~] while doing so would allow envelopes to start
in the middle of a 64-sample block, which would have important
advantages for timing (see the recent "metro below 1ms" thread).

doc/3.audio.examples/D03.envelope.dB.pd could be a starting point. Any
takers?

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__




More information about the Pd-list mailing list