[PD] after pokesdown

Kyle Klipowicz kyleklip at gmail.com
Wed Dec 6 00:32:02 CET 2006


I like this idea.  MPEG4-SA has always seemed like vaporware that will never
get accepted, but maybe someday it will be...perhaps Pd would be a better
framwork than Music N.

Kudos to keeping it vanilla too, because you're right about the portability
issue with that.  So when are we getting native Pd matrix and storage
objects (besides textfile/qlist)?

~Kyle

On 12/6/06, padawan12 <padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:58:48 +0100
> padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk wrote:
>
> I keep
> seeing Pd as vital part of what MPEG4-SA was always supposed to be, but
> never
> really achieved; a way of delivering music as code for clientside
> evaluation.
> Presumably they play OK for everyone, that's just the upshot of writing
> only in
> "Miller Vanilla" and avoiding any externs not in the most basic distros.
>

-- 

http://theradioproject.com
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20061205/c6c94369/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list