[PD] broken analog inputs w/ pduino 0.3?

[B. Bogart]

Hi Pduinoers,

I'm teaching a workshop tomorrow and wanted to get my old arduino demo
working (since reinstalling the machine).

pduino seems to be working, I was able to upload the new firmware, and I
am able to set the digital outputs, and able to use the PWM output.
Problem is I'm not getting anything on the analog inputs, they are all
stuck at 0, no noise or visible changes.

Are the analog inputs known to work with pduino 0.3?

I vaguely remember some issue with the analog inputs conflicting with
the digital inputs or something?

What can I do to debug?

Thanks,

B. Bogart

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> On Jun 1, 2007, at 7:02 PM, B. Bogart wrote:
> 
>> I did notice that, but it seems a proper autoconf build for FTGL could
>> only be a good thing, can't hurt to get the problem moving on both ends.
>>
>> So it seems "getdir" is only available from [ggee/getdir] and not
>> [getdir]. What is the standard way for pd-extended externals to be
>> called with the libdir stuff? Should I change my references to
>> [ggee/getdir] or is there a way I can make [getdir] go to the right
>> place?
> 
> The idea is to have everything in a library except for the bare minimum
> necessary.  You can do [import ggee], then [getdir], or [ggee/getdir],
> or add ggee as a startup lib.  But [ggee/getdir] is the easiest.  I
> guess this stuff is still experimental.  The prefixes/import solve the
> name collision problem, but may add an unnecessary bit of complexity.
> 
>> Are you going to the pd convension? when are you returning? how are you
>> travelling? Karen and I were thinking about going to NYC after the
>> conference since we'll be so close. Have you run into Jeremy Rotzstain
>> yet?
> 
> I am planning to return to NYC on the train.  I'll be pretty busy then
> since the semester will start shortly thereafter and I have to teach a
> new class, meaning lots of prep work.  I'll have some time to hang out
> then.  If you need a place to stay, you can stay with me.  I have a
> comfortable pull-out bed in my living room.
> 
>> I'm aiming to put about 10 hours a week back into pT now, so hopefully
>> things will get moving again. my MSc has turned out to be more work than
>> I expected, mostely due to the fact that everything else, like being an
>> artist, does not stop!!
> 
> That's good news.  Are you thinking of integrating it into Pd-extended,
> or keeping it a separate download?  If you are going to change it a lot,
> I think it would probably make more sense to take it out of Pd-extended,
> so you don't have to deal with old versions and version conflicts.  For
> that reason, I have kept hidio and the Pduino stuff out of this version
> of Pd-extended.  Plus I am basically ready to release it.
> 
> .hc
> 
>>
>> hope to see you.
>>
>> .b.
>>
>>
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> FYI: It builds fine on my machine as is, and on the auto-build machines
>>> too.  It's just a problem with the way that the automatic scripts are
>>> called that cause it not to work.  I outlined the problem and suggested
>>> a solution to IOhannes, hopefully he'll fix it.
>>>
>>> .hc
>>>
>>> On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:49 PM, B. Bogart wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Henry,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to assist in a autobuild system for an OSX application (Gem)
>>>> that depends on FTGL. Problem is that Gem expects FTGL with an
>>>> ftgl-config and ftgl.pc via autoconf. Is a modification of the autoconf
>>>> build for unix to allow compilation on OSX w/out xcode possible?
>>>>
>>>> As OSX is unix it seems an autoconf build for FTGL is reasonable.
>>>> Especially as it simplfies autobuilds of projects not using Xcode.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your time.
>>>> B. Bogart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
>>> exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
>>> idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it
>>> to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the
>>> possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of
>>> it.            - Thomas Jefferson
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling
> away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another
> pink-collar temp pool day.  - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf
> 
> 
>