[PD] pdmtl abstractions questions and comments
matju at artengine.ca
Tue Jul 3 19:00:34 CEST 2007
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Thomas O Fredericks wrote:
> We used "!" (an upside down "i" that stands for interface) before
> instead of "_"
"!" is used by Max to mean "swapped". IMHO that's a better idea than
jMax's [inv+] and [inv*] meaning swapped [-] and [/] respectively, but
GridFlow still uses jMax's syntax, for the obvious reasons.
> but we had to continuously escape it in command lines and
> scripts. So we settled on "_" instead. Of course, we would have liked to
> use "#", but Gridflow's use of it is much better :)
> I have been using the pmdtl folder namespaces for a year now and have
> NEVER had a similar problem. I tried replicating the example in a
> practical context, but I cannot. This issue is a theoretical problem
> that never happens in a practical context.
No, it's not theoretical, it's just false. There are problems that are
similar to that, but knowing pd's implementation, I should've known
better. See my mail to Patrice Colet today about this.
>>> Why not put stuff outside of categories? (Does everything have to be
>>> in a category?)
> Yes, everything does have to be in a category. This constraint makes
> for an environment that is especially useful for newbies and resolves
> a lot of conflicts.
verb/is article/this noun/sentence adjective/easier prep/to verb/read ?
> I teach a lot of Max/Msp and the "new object" box is a godsend for
> them (
> ). Browsing and selecting the right abstraction for the job is a lot
> simpler with this system.
What about http://artengine.ca/desiredata/gallery/completions2.gif ?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list