[PD] how to know line~ has finished
fbar at footils.org
Mon Jul 16 10:10:52 CEST 2007
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
> If you would like a bang message when [1 300(-[line~] is complete then you merely
> have to say
> [t b b]
> | |
> [del 300] [1 300(
> | |
> [outlet done] [line~]
> [outlet line]
> Even though the evaluation goes right-left and depth first the bang appearing
> at [outlet done] happens at the **exact** logical time that [line~] is complete.
As Roman noted it is not exactly exact if you're starting your [line~]
and [delay] from a clock-delayed message, because then [delay] will
still keep logical time, while [line~] is quantized to 64 samples.
But in practice this generally isn't an issue: If such accuracy is
required in an application (e.g. granular synthesis), nobody would
(or should) use [line~] anyway, [vline~] is the line to go for here.
If one *really* wants get back the inaccurate block-quantized delays
one's used to from Max, attached patch illustrates a possible approach
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1946 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pd-list