[PD] [PD-announce] the end of type restrictions
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Mon Jul 23 08:01:58 CEST 2007
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Maybe the Max/MSP reference manual, page 656? Quoting:
>[...]
> type of number, converting the input items as necessary). If no
> argument is typed in, unpack will have two int outlets. Symbol
> arguments allow symbols to pass through, and change numbers to the
> empty symbol ("").
pd's [unpack] does not convert. it says "type mismatch".
I think that in retrospect, the type declaration could be much more useful
if it actually caused conversion, but turning any number to the empty
symbol is certainly not conversion.
> Yes, I know: Pd is not Max and Pd doesn't differentiate ints and floats
> (here)
Just suppose no "i" is used in Max's [unpack] and no int is passed to it;
and suppose no "p" is used in Pd's [unpack] and no pointer is passed to
it; then the essential differences of both [unpack]s should become most
obvious.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list