[PD] GEM pix_buffer
derek at umatic.nl
Mon Jul 23 20:43:07 CEST 2007
chris clepper wrote:
> Yes. Reading and writing a pix_buffer is at most a memory copy operation.
Great! That's what I thought.
> On OSX you can load a compressed video file into RAM using the 'ram'
> message. This will use less memory than pix_buffer but still use CPU
> for decoding the video.
That's the problem... we're long on memory and short on CPU with the
patch I'm working on. I hoped I could use [pix_buffer] to get some of
that CPU back at the expense of a lot of RAM...
Besides, I couldn't preload *all* my clips with the 'ram' message
anyways. Only the one I'm currently playing. My patch has 48 clips which
will be addressed by three different players, so a way of storing all
the vids ahead of time is required to avoid lagtime starting the video
when it's requested.
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista
---Oblique Strategy # 138:
"Retrace your steps"
More information about the Pd-list