[PD] [PD-announce] the end of type restrictions

Chris McCormick chris at mccormick.cx
Tue Jul 24 07:57:25 CEST 2007

On Sun, 01 Jul 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Chris McCormick wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:29:40PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> >>Anyway, seriously, if you wanted [unpost] as an external
> >>for Miller's pd, you can't, because Miller rejected the
> >>sys_printhook patch in 2004.
> >
> >Maybe it would go in now that there is this excellent
> >concrete example of being able to catch and process errors in-patch.
> If it makes sense to you that excellent concrete examples can push
> new features into pd, I cannot help your case. It doesn't work that
> way.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:51:21AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> It's very possible for you to transfer the features. You only have to 
> rewrite the code the way that Miller wants them to be written like.

So why don't more people do that? Rewrite the code the way [they think]
Miller wants instead of forking their own incompatible version of Pd?




More information about the Pd-list mailing list