[PD] [pool] binary for Mac Intel?

[Thomas Grill]

Hey all,
i added new versions for binaries of my externals at 
http://grrrr.org/ext/beta.
Along with that i made a more elaborate skeleton for the pool pdpedia 
page and hope to find time for the other externals soon.

gr~~~

Luke Iannini (pd) schrieb:
> On Jan 3, 2008 1:44 PM, Thomas Grill <gr at grrrr.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> I committed some stuff to the PD CVS that should prevent buffer
>> overruns in these cases. I hope that it doesn't have bad side effects.
>>
>>     
>
> Woop!  Much love Thomas!  I'm building it now and I'll have a go with
> it.  Thanks tons!
>
>   
>> Am 03.01.2008 um 11:52 schrieb Damian Stewart:
>>     
>>>> I don't mean to nag, but I have a really cool update to Memento that
>>>> adds [commun]-exposed parameter listing for midi-controller
>>>> assignment
>>>> to any Memento-enabled abstraction.  The overrun means it kills Pd
>>>> though (with any nominal level of parameters), so I had to stop
>>>> development : (.
>>>>         
>>> ... because even though i don't understand this completely, it sounds
>>> *really* *really* nice.
>>>
>>>       
>
> I think so too : ).  Hopefully I'll have a beta out next-weekish...
>
>   
>>> one thing i did notice playing around with Memento last night - if you
>>> switch substates it only seems to add whatever values you change
>>> between
>>> switching to the pool. this means that if i have one patch substate
>>> (call
>>> it substate 0) that sets all the parameters, then make a new substate
>>> (substate 1) and change only one value, only that one value will be
>>> stored
>>> - which means that to recall the state of the system completely
>>> come next
>>> time, i would have to load first substate 0 then substate 1, to
>>> completely
>>> set all the parameters.
>>>
>>>       
>
> I remember playing with the substates but don't remember this
> happening, anyway it sounds like a bug.  I'll have a look while I'm
> working on the other stuff (since I've been meaning to use the
> substates more myself).
>
>   
>>>> And if Novation ever manages to release the SDK for the RemoteSL,
>>>> I'll
>>>> be adding automatic display of parameter names on the RemoteSL's LCD
>>>> screens upon assignment...
>>>>         
>>> it might be easier to reverse-engineer the Automap protocol. it's just
>>> transmitted over sysex AFAIK. and if it's not apparently it's very
>>> easy to
>>> sniff USB devices. i might give this a go next week..
>>>
>>>       
> Awesome!  I guess I better make sure the sysex patches are in pd-extended...
>
> (Oh, also, I got an email from Novation last week saying the SDK was
> still soon forthcoming, but then they also said it would be out with
> the 4.1 software and it wasn't)
>
> Cheers
> Luke
>
>