[PD] SSSAD vs MEMENTO
kyleklip at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 08:08:24 CET 2008
Wait, isn't OSC GNU? Deja vu for some reason...
On Jan 4, 2008 10:23 PM, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > There will be no direct support for OSC in [sssad] unless Miller
> > decides to include some OSCroute-variant in plain Pd, as sssad will
> > never require externals.
> Has anyone lobbied Miller for this feature?
> I would love to hear what Miller thinks about OSC in Pd canonical. I
> queried this in 2005
> <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/033012.html> but
> he never replied to that thread.
> Seems to me that OSC is as valuable to users as MIDI is these days. As
> many bits of software use OSC now as bits of hardware use MIDI, and
> even competing commercial products use OSC. Also, the code is there,
> ready to go into Pd cannonical quite easily.
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
---- -------- - ------
More information about the Pd-list