[PD] rradical hierarchy

Phil Stone pkstone at ucdavis.edu
Mon Mar 17 23:29:49 CET 2008


I also find [sssad] easier to understand, but I really like the power of 
[pool] underneath memento (as well as the OSC integration).

I suppose [pool] could be used with [sssad] as well.  I'd be interested 
in hearing more of your thoughts on the future of state-saving in PD, 
Frank (and Luke).


Phil


Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
>
>   
>> I find that powerful and complex PD systems such as memento/rradical are 
>> very difficult to understand without a little more documentation.  When 
>> I try to follow what's going on inside of [originator] (both in original 
>> memento and in semento), I rapidly get lost. 
>>     
>
> Understandable, because it's ugly. I'm relucant to touch this myself,
> fearing I might break things. That's also why I'd rather promote
> [sssad]. It's not as powerful (yet) but has a much cleaner design
> that's easier to extend and also more flexible in the long run.
> I wouldn't recommend to spend a lot of time in [originator]'s
> internals.
>
> Ciao
>   





More information about the Pd-list mailing list