[PD] default [output~] in Pd-extended

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:45 PM, hard off wrote:

> a very simple solution would be to use a subpatch instead of an  
> abstraction in the help files.
>
>
> [pd output~]

Yeah, some of them have a subpatch.

> this would also remedy the problem reported more often:  "why  
> doesn't the output~ object work when i copy the help files to my  
> desktop?"


Having a abstraction in  "extra" would also solve this problem.  I  
think that we can make [ezdac~] better by adding the db numbox and  
mute function from Miller's [output~], and the green/white toggle from  
[pddp/dsp].

.hc




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally  
for machines to execute.
  - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs