[PD] Pdpedia and random generation
lukexipd at gmail.com
Fri Apr 10 22:37:05 CEST 2009
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Philip Potter
<philip.g.potter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Alexandre Porres <porres at gmail.com>:
>> so we need :someone" to manage the system, ok, but then I see that this
>> problem is kinda well solved, right?
>> But how do you all see the writting of articles? Is it growing out well? I
>> believe "someone" could also direct how things are going, and that a main
>> team could work on it by fomenting its development and all...
> Something like a WikiProject on wikipedia? It would be good to have
> standards on how articles should be formatted and what kind of
> information should be presented. I see there has been some effort to
> generate a standard layout for an article on an object, with inlets,
> outlets, arguments and messages as separate sections; but I can't find
> a good article to serve as an example for how all articles should
> look. The best I can find is:
> If more articles looked like this, I think pdpedia would be much more useful.
I made this
long ago with the intention of it serving as an example (but of
course, it could use improvement).
As you can see, it makes use of a few tricks for styling object
references I added when Pdpedia was birthed - I think they were
forgotten though : ). Check out the source to see how they're done.
> Do we want pdpedia to just be a reference manual of objects, or do we
> also want to include design patterns such as the [pack 0 0 0 0
> 0]/[unpack 0 0 0 0 0] idiom mentioned elsethread, tutorials, good
> practices and suchlike?
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list