[PD] tabwriteat~ object

Charles Henry czhenry at gmail.com
Tue Aug 4 15:00:55 CEST 2009

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris McCormick<chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:30:29PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
>> Yep, it's a damn pity I used the tabwrite~ name for the wrong object!  We're
>> all stuck with it now.
>> I've been planning to put an object like this into Pd for many years, but
>> can't think of a "correct" name... anyone have a better idea than "tabwriteat~"
> Maybe you could pass [tabwrite~] an argument to specify whether it should have
> an extra 'index' inlet?
> Chris.

Doesn't tabwrite~ have a second inlet to set the name of the array
(It's been awhile)?  If so, then what harm could there be in
re-writing the object with 3 inlets?  Would it break something?


More information about the Pd-list mailing list