[PD] sustain pedal abstraction

[Amos Robinson]

Well, that would be exactly what I was looking for. Thanks! I must
have skimmed past that last night...

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Jonathan Wilkes<jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Have you tried using the [bag] object?
>
> -Jonathan
>
> --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Amos Robinson <amos.robinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Amos Robinson <amos.robinson at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [PD] sustain pedal abstraction
>> To: "pd list" <pd-list at iem.at>
>> Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 3:06 PM
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Just in case you're interested, I wanted to use my sustain
>> pedal in
>> Pd, so wrote these abstractions:
>> sustain, with three inputs: note, velocity, pedal (nonzero
>> for
>> sustain, zero for no effect)
>>
>> dam, with two inputs: a list value, and flow bool.
>>
>> I guess when flow is 0 it's like a [pipe 1e999], and flow
>> set to 1 it
>> flushes. I thought of doing it that way but felt that using
>> lists
>> would be better. I think after actually implementing it
>> though I've
>> changed my mind.
>>
>> Question: is there a simpler way than these that I'm
>> missing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amos Robinson
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at
>> mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
>
>