[PD] [sigmund~] and [fiddle~]

jurgen noise.now at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 12:34:30 CET 2009

I only have little experience, but from what I've seen so far is that pitch detection with sigmund~ is faster than fiddle~.

On the other hand I found the level setting 'minpower' not working or at least nor responsive to changes that I tried out. I do not have experimented with the corresponding settings in fiddle~.


On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:10 PM, ypatios wrote:

> But under the hood I think it uses a better algorithm. In my experiments it
> reports pitch faster and more reliable and stable than fiddle~. So if you can
> use sigmund~ I would recommend it over fiddle~ as a replacement.
> Back in the LAC 2008 in Cologne, I asked Miller that very question: what is the difference between fiddle~ and sigmund~.
> He said sigmund~ was the best pitch tracker he had programmed so far.
> So I guess fiddle is still alive just for compatibility reasons.
> alabala
> -- 
> ypatios
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20091208/4e131944/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list