[PD] [sigmund~] and [fiddle~]
noise.now at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 12:34:30 CET 2009
I only have little experience, but from what I've seen so far is that pitch detection with sigmund~ is faster than fiddle~.
On the other hand I found the level setting 'minpower' not working or at least nor responsive to changes that I tried out. I do not have experimented with the corresponding settings in fiddle~.
On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:10 PM, ypatios wrote:
> But under the hood I think it uses a better algorithm. In my experiments it
> reports pitch faster and more reliable and stable than fiddle~. So if you can
> use sigmund~ I would recommend it over fiddle~ as a replacement.
> Back in the LAC 2008 in Cologne, I asked Miller that very question: what is the difference between fiddle~ and sigmund~.
> He said sigmund~ was the best pitch tracker he had programmed so far.
> So I guess fiddle is still alive just for compatibility reasons.
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list