[PD] [GEM-dev] crazy bug: all user actions executed twice
jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 17:20:29 CET 2009
yes this happened to me a while ago, can't remember what os. I am not
sure I was using gem either. the reason i am so forgetful is that:
-it probably it went away
-or it is in a computer i don't often use.
I'll let you know if I find it again.
sorry for being unhelpful, but at least you know this has happened to someone.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Matteo Sisti Sette
<matteosistisette at gmail.com> wrote:
> I write just to see if anybody has already seen this happaning and can give
> me some clue as how to avoid it.
> I am not even sure the problem is with GEM, but I have worked on much more
> huge patches in PD without gem and never seen anything similar.
> I am on Windows Vista with the latest PD Vanilla and the latest GEM.
> I have not been able to isolate the problem; if anybody with some
> possibility to debug it is willing to try the patch and find out something I
> can send it to him/her.
> So, the problem is, in some occasions, very frequently (usually after
> opening the main patch, closing it, and opening it again), every user action
> (e.g.: clicking on a bang or toggle, hitting some key INCLUDING ctrl+1 to
> create an object or introducing input into an object or message box, or even
> a "save as") gets executed two or even more times. As you can imagine that
> fucks everything up.
> If I just open the patch and run it it works fine, but for even the smallest
> change that implies modifying some abstraction, I have to close PD, open it
> again, modify the abstraction I have to modify, save, close PD and open it
> again, since if I just save or even if I close all patches and open the main
> one again, everything is fucked up. It is impossible to work this way.
> Usually restarting the computer makes the bug disappear but then it is a
> matter of minutes before it starts showing again.
> I know that, if this is the first time you hear of it, you will hardly be
> hable to help, but my hope is that someone has observed this already and
> have been able to link it to a particular object or condition.
> By the way, I have checked that when this happens, NO duplicate "pd.exe" nor
> "whish84" process exists (provided that task manager is reliable).
> Thanks in advance
> Matteo Sisti Sette
> matteosistisette at gmail.com
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
Jaime E Oliver LR
joliverl at ucsd.edu
858 750 0924 (cel)
858 202 1522 (home)
9168 Regents Rd. Apt. G
La Jolla, CA 92037
More information about the Pd-list