[PD] [wrap] behavior, zexy vs. vanilla 0.42

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> I was just looking at Pd 0.42.5's [wrap].  It doesn't use arguments like 
> zexy's [wrap].  Since each has different behavior, it seems like a good 
> time to look at how [wrap] should handle its upper and lower limits.  
> Since [wrap] is closely related to [clip], it should be structured the 
> same way, in terms of arguments and inlets:
>
> - first arg sets min
> - second arg set max
>
> - first inlet accepts numbers to wrap
> - second inlet sets min
> - third inlet sets max
>
> - arguments default to 0 and 1
>
> zexy's is the same as this, except for the inlets.

The third [wrap] in maxlib is what you describe, but I think, zexy's wrap
behaves differently: It doesn't care about min or max at all, instead it sorts
both limits automatically internally. 

Ciao
-- 
Frank