[PD] pix_snap + pix_record = problem

news at petervenus.de news at petervenus.de
Sun Mar 21 15:45:35 CET 2010

I am working with [pix_snap] and its running quite good.
In the attachment you will find a test-patch i build out of help-files.
While playing around with [pix_snap]i noticed, that its quite important, 
to have different gemheads for the parts where you do something
 to the source-signal and the part of the patch where you record the video.
like having [gemhead 5] for the first, and [gemhead 55] for the snapping part.
that way the first part gets handled before the image is snapped.
hope that helps.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Matteo Sisti Sette 
Gesendet: 21.03.2010 13:23:16
An: Jaime Oliver 
Betreff: Re: [PD] pix_snap + pix_record = problem

Jaime Oliver escribió:
> I had a similar error in osx10.6. 

Did you find a workaround? Could you ever record a sequence of snapped 
pixes into a video file?


Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistisette at gmail.com

Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pix_snap_test.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100321/e149ffe2/attachment.obj>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list